News for Greens
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Google
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Receive News for Greens by Email

Not playing around: Army to invest $50M in combat training games

Home» Violence » Not playing around: Army to invest $50M in combat training games

News for Greens

Edited by Roger Snyder

"I say, if your knees aren't green by the end of the day, you ought to seriously re-examine your life." -Calvin

About Roger Snyder

Visit our companion blog Greens for Greens for news about the Green Party.

Categories

Links

  • Greens for Greens
  • Green Party of Suffolk
  • Green Party in New York State
  • Appalachian Greens
  • Campus Greens
  • Feministing
  • Green Party of the United States
  • Green Party Watch
  • Greens/GPUSA
  • Independent Political Report
  • On the Wilder Side
  • The Last Page of the Internet

By Seth Robson, Stars and Stripes
European edition, Sunday, November 23, 2008


Photos by Seth Robson/S&S
Cadets play DARWARS-Ambush during training at the Camp Normandy Noncommissioned Officers Academy in Grafenwöhr, Germany, on Jan. 20, 2006.
Purchase reprint


GRAFENWÖHR, Germany — The Army has created a video game unit and will invest $50 million over five years on games and gaming systems designed to prepare soldiers for combat.

Lt. Col. Gary Stephens, product manager for air and ground tactical trainers at Project Executive Office — Simulation Training and Instrumentation said Thursday that the $50 million has been approved for a “games for training” program starting in 2010.

“The Army takes this seriously,” Stephens said of PEO-STRI and its Army gaming unit, which will handle military video game requirements. “We own gaming for the Army — from requirements through procurement,” he said.

Game development has become a multibillion-dollar industry in recent years, with large game studios employing thousands of developers and sales that compete with Hollywood’s blockbusters.

“We want to take advantage of that, but we don’t have the intent to become a competitor with the commercial gaming industry,” Stephens said. “We don’t have the intent or capability to be a commercial game house.”

Instead, the Army gaming unit will watch trends in the industry and identify technology that can be used for military training, he said.

The need for video games as training aids was judged so great that the Army wanted to get products out to units before the funding came online.

In addition to the $50 million, the Army gaming unit has an undisclosed additional budget to purchase a state-of-the-art commercial video game system that will be fielded for training in February.

The Army already uses a commercial first-person shooter video game — “DARWARS Ambush” — to train soldiers. Since 2006, PEO-STRI has fielded more than 3,000 copies of the game to the Army, Air Force, Navy, Marines, Coast Guard and Homeland Defense, Stephens said.

“DARWARS Ambush” was modified by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to train soldiers using desktop computers, he said. It focuses on teaching soldiers how to react to ambushes and roadside bomb attacks on convoys, he said.

However, the game is based on 20th-century gaming technology and can accommodate a limited number of players in a relatively small virtual battle space. It can’t interact with the Army’s real world computerized battle command systems and trainers can’t edit terrain or change scenarios during play, he said.

The new game — dubbed “Game After Ambush” — will be an off-the-shelf commercial product that comes with tools that will allow the Army to make almost any modification necessaryto terrain, scenarios, missions, etc.

“We have an impending award announcement for the contract that we will make in the next couple of weeks,” Stephens said.

Market research suggests there are many current products that might meet the Army’s requirements and a number of developers have put forward their games for the Army’s consideration, he said. Initially, the Army expects to have to make few modifications.

Col. Mark McManigal, the capabilities manger for gaming under the Training and Doctrine Command, said the selected game must provide low-cost training and must not require large number of technicians to run. It must also have a play-back function for after-action reviews, he said.

“One of the major events for training is to be able to capture all these events, good or bad, throughout the entire scenario,” he said.

Trainers must be able to edit the game during play to change the difficulty level or add complexity to an exercise. For example, they must also be able to edit terrain to replicate training areas or combat zones, he said.

“And we want it to be portable so we can move it to different units on an installation,” he said.

TRADOC is responsible for determining what features are needed for training soldiers, while PEO-STRI is in charge of acquiring and fielding the system.

Leslie Duvow, project director for gaming at PEO-STRI, said the Army will have 70 gaming systems in 53 locations in the United States, Germany, Italy and South Korea between February and September 2009.

“Each system will consist of 52 computers with ancillary equipment including steering wheels, headsets and mice,” she said.

Soldiers will be able to drive virtual vehicles, fire virtual weapons, pilot virtual unmanned aerial vehicles and do “most anything a soldier does” in a virtual battle space as large as 100 kilometers by 100 kilometers, she said.

McManigal said the game will replicate what soldiers encounter on today’s battlefield — from fighting in urban terrain and convoy operations to reacting to contact and ambush operations.

“Your imagination will be your only limiting factor,” he said.

The new game will also be able to interact with the Army’s battle command systems that soldiers use in the real world to track equipment, enemy and friendly forces using computerized maps, he said.

The systems will be built to train a single platoon of soldiers at a time, but they could be linked over the Internet to train even more soldiers, he said.

Another program being developed by the Army for fielding in 2009 — called “dismounted soldier” — allows personnel to don virtual-reality goggles and walk around virtual battle space carrying a “weapon” that allows them to shoot at virtual targets, Stephens said.

“We are just starting on the tip of the spear of where this is going to go,” McManigal said.

Share Tags: war <BR/>
  • Share this:
  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
war

Support the Green Party

Buy Green Party Merchandise

Google Friends

(c) 2012 News for Greens - Web Design by Jason Bobich

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.