News for Greens
  • Facebook
  • Flickr
  • Google
  • Tumblr
  • Twitter
  • Home
  • About
  • Forum
  • Receive News for Greens by Email

Supreme Court rolls back campaign spending limits

Home» News » Supreme Court rolls back campaign spending limits

News for Greens

Edited by Roger Snyder

"I say, if your knees aren't green by the end of the day, you ought to seriously re-examine your life." -Calvin

About Roger Snyder

Visit our companion blog Greens for Greens for news about the Green Party.

Categories

Links

  • Greens for Greens
  • Green Party of Suffolk
  • Green Party in New York State
  • Appalachian Greens
  • Campus Greens
  • Feministing
  • Green Party of the United States
  • Green Party Watch
  • Greens/GPUSA
  • Independent Political Report
  • On the Wilder Side
  • The Last Page of the Internet

[From Washington Post]

Supreme Court rules 5-4 to ease restrictions on spending by corporations and unions in political campaigns.

By MARK SHERMAN
The Associated Press

C93F1465-B79D-4BE4-8D89-4431456BF46B.jpgWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has ruled that corporations may spend freely to support or oppose candidates for president and Congress, easing decades-old limits on their participation in federal campaigns.

By a 5-4 vote, the court on Thursday overturned a 20-year-old ruling that said corporations can be prohibited from using money from their general treasuries to pay for their own campaign ads. The decision, which almost certainly will also allow labor unions to participate more freely in campaigns, threatens similar limits imposed by 24 states.

It leaves in place a prohibition on direct contributions to candidates from corporations and unions.

Critics of the stricter limits have argued that they amount to an unconstitutional restraint of free speech, and the court majority apparently agreed.

“The censorship we now confront is vast in its reach,” Justice Anthony Kennedy said in his majority opinion, joined by his four more conservative colleagues.

However, Justice John Paul Stevens, dissenting from the main holding, said, “The court’s ruling threatens to undermine the integrity of elected institutions around the nation.”

Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer and Sonia Sotomayor joined Stevens’ dissent, parts of which he read aloud in the courtroom.

The justices also struck down part of the landmark McCain-Feingold campaign finance bill that barred union- and corporate-paid issue ads in the closing days of election campaigns.

Advocates of strong campaign finance regulations have predicted that a court ruling against the limits would lead to a flood of corporate and union money in federal campaigns as early as this year’s midterm congressional elections.

The decision, written by Justice Anthony Kennedy, removes limits on independent expenditures that are not coordinated with candidates’ campaigns.

The case also does not affect political action committees, which mushroomed after post-Watergate laws set the first limits on contributions by individuals to candidates. Corporations, unions and others may create PACs to contribute directly to candidates, but they must be funded with voluntary contributions from employees, members and other individuals, not by corporate or union treasuries.

Share Tags: Sonia Sotomayor, justice anthony kennedy, campaign finance bill, campaign finance regulations <BR/>
  • Share this:
  • Share
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Email
campaign finance bill, campaign finance regulations, federal campaigns, justice anthony kennedy, mccain feingold, ruth bader ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, stephen breyer

Support the Green Party

Buy Green Party Merchandise

Google Friends

(c) 2012 News for Greens - Web Design by Jason Bobich

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.